Will Commissioner Parent Ever Tell the Truth?
At the
August 7, 2018 commission meeting, Mr. Parent spoke at length (as usual). He is
working on the 2019 budget and warned taxpayers that it will be a tough one. Translation:
tax increase. What do you expect? Team Santiago has been giving away taxpayer’s
money left and right. (Read the blogs on the Demolition at 109 E. Main Street).
Mr. Parent
also discussed the city’s attorneys. He spoke about the attorneys who have
already exhausted their budgets exceeding their contracts and needing an
additional $200,000 to make it to the end of the year. Mr. Parent as usual did
not accept any of the responsibility but blamed the over runs on others. Team Santiago chose the out of town attorneys
and agreed to the contracts even though they were not the low bids. Mr. Parent as
usually distorted the facts and ignored the following:
1.
Fact: Team
Santiago hired Doug Long’s law firm which is ethically challenged and has been fired by other municipalities for a
variety of reasons. (See Millville Attorneys: Long and Schroeder blog). Why
would you hire this firm? Answer: You owe the firm and are obligated to it
because of significant campaign contributions. “Campaign payback”.
2.
Fact: Team
Santiago chose to pay the Long and Schroeder law firms $150/hour. Mr. Russell’s
bid for 2019 was $110/hour. There were no complaints and nothing but praise for
Mr. Russell when he served as solicitor the preceding year. The problem is he
didn’t ante up enough in campaign contributions to get the job. “More campaign
payback”
3.
Fact: Team
Santiago hired James Schroeder for $55,000/year. However, this included limited
services. Mr. Schroeder bills extra for services that were normally included;
such as questions from City staff. The
point again is why? The answer to that is so that Mr. Schroeder could be paid
back for his campaign contributions.
4.
Mr. Parent
mentioned what the city had paid Brock Russell. When doing so Mr. Parent
compared what Mr. Russell was paid in 3 years to Mr. Schroeder’s one year bill.
Furthermore, Mr. Parent failed to mention that Mr. Russell’s bill included tax
appeals and affordable housing issues, which are now being done and charged for
by Long not Schroeder. To compare figures accurately and honestly, Mr. Parent
should have added in Mr. Long’s fees for tax appeals and affordable housing and
compared similar time frames. More purposeful deception by Mr. Parent.
5.
Fact: Mr. Parent stated at the commission meeting he would never question an attorney’s bill. That's scary! Mr. Parent, Director of Revenue and Finance, your job is to watch the
taxpayer’s money and make sure it is well and properly spent. Since Mr. Parent is not doing this, who is? (The meeting is available on YouTube using the link on the city’s website).
Ms. Udalovas
did question the additional funds for the attorneys and did vote no for all 5
of the resolutions. Thank you for looking out for the taxpayers. However Ms.
Udalovas’ suggestions to monitor the high billing are supposed to be already in
place. The law requires that the bills be checked before being paid. This is
Mr. Parent’s responsibility.
It is time
for Mr. Parent and the rest of Team Santiago to accept responsibility for what
they are doing. Stop the spin and do your job.
Comments
I am going to give you a quick financial budgeting lesson. You CAN NOT spend more than your income & should never spend your savings. This is precisely what you did & now the tax payer has to BAIL you out & you tell them it will be UGLY! How about making it UGLY for all those "pay to play" contracts you made and make decisions that make financial sense for the tax payer.