The Demolition of 109 E. Main Street: Part IV

The change orders are already beginning to roll in for Mayor Santiago's million dollar demolition at 109 East Main Street. Many things were not covered in Perryman's generous million dollar contract for the demolition. One item not covered was asbestos removal. Billy Perryman signed a contract with Brick Industries Inc. for $23,527.00 for asbestos removal on behalf of the city of Millville. At the May 16th commission meeting, Team Santiago approved a change order in the amount of $137,676.25 for the company chosen by Billy Perryman. Once again there were no bids and no oversight by the city. Santiago, Parent, Udalovas, Pepitone, and Cooper all voted yes.

This raises several questions. Why was this not sent out to bid? How can a contractor sign a contract for the city? Why was there no explanation for a change order over $100,000?

The permit fees were also waived for Mr. Perryman. This is against the city's Municipal Code 11-82i which states the fees are only waived for public buildings or if the work is to make the building more accessible for the disabled.

Team Santiago needs to explain why they are allowing Perryman Excavating to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars more of city money with no oversight. Also, Commissioner Udalovas needs to explain why the permit fees were waived by her department. Team Santiago needs to do their jobs and protect the taxpayers' money.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Who wrote the contract with Perryman and isn't abestos removal standard in demolitions? If the "contractor" hired the company to handle the abestos removal because he is not certified to do the removal, than shouldn't that cost be paid by Perryman?
May 25, 2018 at 5:39 PM
Millville Insider said…
The Perryman contract which Team Santiago approved, did not include asbestos removal. Perryman picked the asbestos removal company. The original cost was around $23,000 based on non-union employees doing the work. When the work was actually done, union employees were used resulting in a $100,000+ change order. Team Santiago agreed to pay the change order. Another example of Team Santiago not looking at the details and not looking out for the citizens of Millville.
May 25, 2018 at 10:30 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ANOTHER LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITY

 Chief Farabella was just reappointed for another 3 years even though a lawsuit was filed against  Farabella and Pepitone by a city employee.The lawsuit is worth reading.  The allegations, if true, are startling. These allegations also raise the question should Farabella have been reappointed at this time? Did the commissioners look into the allegations prior to voting? The lawsuit involves the departments of Parent and Pepitone who both voted to reappoint Farabella. Did they do their due diligence? Of interest is line 55 in the lawsuit. It clearly states that Doug Long was performing legal duties for the city in 2019. Didn't the commissioners claim that Mr. Long was not involved in the city, only Marmero and Grace. Remember at election time the lack of transparency, the lies, the lack of due diligence and the waste of your tax payers money. Millville needs commissioners who are transparent, who do their due diligence and have the interests of the citizens of Millville at...
Read more

Team Santiago Raises Your Taxes Again!!!

It is no surprise that Team Santiago raised Millville’s taxes again. Last year it was by 4.5% and this year it is 5%.   The county and the school board also raised their taxes so the taxpayer in Millville is looking at a 10% increase in their property taxes. This comes at a time when many individuals are out of work due to COVID-19 and there is no end in sight. This affects not only the taxpayers but every citizen in Millville as landlords will have to increase rents and businesses will have to charge more to meet expenses. So what did Team Santiago have to say for themselves when they voted for the tax increase –nothing. As usual they did not answer the public’s questions and did not explain their votes. Mr. Pepitone once again voted for the tax increase even though he is behind on paying his own taxes. He should understand the burden of taxes as it seems to be a burden to him. In his ending comments Mr. Parent said this was the toughest budget he had to work with (wh...
Read more

WHO WILL FILL QUINN'S VACANT SEAT?

Now that Quinn has resigned for the second time, what happens to his empty seat? The commission has the option to appoint someone until the next election which is November 2022. Who do the new commissioners think that person should be? The last time Quinn resigned, Commissioner Sooy held fast to the belief that the person who came in 6th in the election should fill the seat. This time the 6th place person is Robert McQuade.  This is the only fair  scenario as the present commission has not even been sworn in yet. Hopefully Commissioner Sooy and the new commissioners will agree that Mr. McQuade should be appointed. Robert Mcquade put the time in to run for the office. The voters had enough faith in Mr. McQuade that he came in 6th with over 2000 votes. It seems fair that he takes the seat.  In November 2022 anyone can run for this open seat and then the voters will decide who the commissioner will be for the remaining three years.   Comment and post who you believ...
Read more