The Demolition at 109 E. Main Street: Part V


At the June 5, 2018 meeting, Team Santiago approved another change order for the demolition of 109 E. Main Street. When questioned during the agenda session by two taxpayers no answers were given. Once again Mayor Santiago stated he did not have to answer any questions. The questions asked were during the public session regarding agenda items. This is the time to question and discuss what the commissioners will be voting on during the meeting. Once again no answers were given. One question was what is the change order for? The basis for the additional money is not listed in the agenda. No Commissioner replied, but the city clerk said that it does not have to be attached and anyone can stop at the clerk’s office to get a free copy on anything on the agenda. In the past the information was attached and available on line.  So much for the transparency Team Santiago promised.

When it came time to vote, Commissioner Udalovas admitted she had not seen the change order and did not review it, as there was no itemization attached to the agenda. She asked Ms. Hitchner, the city clerk, how she should vote – no or abstain. This brings up the point of why is an elected official asking a city employee how to vote.  Commissioner Udalovas was elected to make decisions. Ms. Hitchner replied that she does not have to attach the information to the agenda but it is available in the clerk’s office. As the 4 of the 5 commissoners have full-time jobs, when are they supposed to stop in to get the information? This also means that the commissioners are not prepared for the meetings. They have not done the research necessary to make informed decisions prior to voting. Commissioner Udalovas asked Ms. Hitchner if the change order resolution should be tabled. Finally at that point Ms. Hitchner read the change order that she had all along.

So even without being informed the change order passed, another $260,000 of taxpayer money gone. The way this was handled raises some serious questions:

1.     Why is Team Santiago not preparing for the meetings?

2.     Why is information being withheld from the commissioners and the public? Is this the city clerk’s decision or was she directed by one of Team Santiago?

3.     Why does a city commissioner have to ask a city employee how to vote?

4.     When will the change orders end?

      Would any questions have been asked by Team Santiago if the two taxpayers had not raise questions about the change orders?

And most important and fundamental for every vote: How can you vote on something that you know nothing about? Irresponsible comes to mind!



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Team Santiago Raises Your Taxes Again!!!

It is no surprise that Team Santiago raised Millville’s taxes again. Last year it was by 4.5% and this year it is 5%.   The county and the school board also raised their taxes so the taxpayer in Millville is looking at a 10% increase in their property taxes. This comes at a time when many individuals are out of work due to COVID-19 and there is no end in sight. This affects not only the taxpayers but every citizen in Millville as landlords will have to increase rents and businesses will have to charge more to meet expenses. So what did Team Santiago have to say for themselves when they voted for the tax increase –nothing. As usual they did not answer the public’s questions and did not explain their votes. Mr. Pepitone once again voted for the tax increase even though he is behind on paying his own taxes. He should understand the burden of taxes as it seems to be a burden to him. In his ending comments Mr. Parent said this was the toughest budget he had to work with (which
Read more

ANOTHER LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITY

 Chief Farabella was just reappointed for another 3 years even though a lawsuit was filed against  Farabella and Pepitone by a city employee.The lawsuit is worth reading.  The allegations, if true, are startling. These allegations also raise the question should Farabella have been reappointed at this time? Did the commissioners look into the allegations prior to voting? The lawsuit involves the departments of Parent and Pepitone who both voted to reappoint Farabella. Did they do their due diligence? Of interest is line 55 in the lawsuit. It clearly states that Doug Long was performing legal duties for the city in 2019. Didn't the commissioners claim that Mr. Long was not involved in the city, only Marmero and Grace. Remember at election time the lack of transparency, the lies, the lack of due diligence and the waste of your tax payers money. Millville needs commissioners who are transparent, who do their due diligence and have the interests of the citizens of Millville at heart. Th
Read more

WHO WILL FILL QUINN'S VACANT SEAT?

Now that Quinn has resigned for the second time, what happens to his empty seat? The commission has the option to appoint someone until the next election which is November 2022. Who do the new commissioners think that person should be? The last time Quinn resigned, Commissioner Sooy held fast to the belief that the person who came in 6th in the election should fill the seat. This time the 6th place person is Robert McQuade.  This is the only fair  scenario as the present commission has not even been sworn in yet. Hopefully Commissioner Sooy and the new commissioners will agree that Mr. McQuade should be appointed. Robert Mcquade put the time in to run for the office. The voters had enough faith in Mr. McQuade that he came in 6th with over 2000 votes. It seems fair that he takes the seat.  In November 2022 anyone can run for this open seat and then the voters will decide who the commissioner will be for the remaining three years.   Comment and post who you believe should fill the open s
Read more