The Demolition at 109 E. Main Street: Part V
At the June 5, 2018 meeting, Team Santiago approved another
change order for the demolition of 109 E. Main Street. When questioned during
the agenda session by two taxpayers no answers were given. Once again Mayor
Santiago stated he did not have to answer any questions. The questions asked
were during the public session regarding agenda items. This is the time to question
and discuss what the commissioners will be voting on during the meeting. Once again
no answers were given. One question was what is the change order for? The basis
for the additional money is not listed in the agenda. No Commissioner replied,
but the city clerk said that it does not have to be attached and anyone can
stop at the clerk’s office to get a free copy on anything on the agenda. In the
past the information was attached and available on line. So much for the transparency Team Santiago
promised.
When it came time to vote, Commissioner Udalovas admitted
she had not seen the change order and did not review it, as there was no
itemization attached to the agenda. She asked Ms. Hitchner, the city clerk, how
she should vote – no or abstain. This brings up the point of why is an elected
official asking a city employee how to vote.
Commissioner Udalovas was elected to make decisions. Ms. Hitchner
replied that she does not have to attach the information to the agenda but it
is available in the clerk’s office. As the 4 of the 5 commissoners have
full-time jobs, when are they supposed to stop in to get the information? This
also means that the commissioners are not prepared for the meetings. They have
not done the research necessary to make informed decisions prior to voting.
Commissioner Udalovas asked Ms. Hitchner if the change order resolution should
be tabled. Finally at that point Ms. Hitchner read the change order that she
had all along.
So even without being informed the change order passed,
another $260,000 of taxpayer money gone. The way this was handled raises some
serious questions:
1.
Why is Team Santiago not preparing for the
meetings?
2.
Why is information being withheld from the
commissioners and the public? Is this the city clerk’s decision or was she
directed by one of Team Santiago?
3.
Why does a city commissioner have to ask a city
employee how to vote?
4.
When will the change orders end?
Would any questions have been asked by Team Santiago if the two taxpayers had not raise questions about the change
orders?
And most important and fundamental for every vote: How can
you vote on something that you know nothing about? Irresponsible comes to mind!
Comments